tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post113186039231077790..comments2024-03-21T14:59:20.729-04:00Comments on NT Blog: Q sceptical Brits?Mark Goodacrehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1131979502767344532005-11-14T09:45:00.000-05:002005-11-14T09:45:00.000-05:00I have to agree with Loren's comments: I find that...I have to agree with Loren's comments: I find that American academia is much more trendy than European academia. I find many more American scholars who simply take over the latest trend without looking closely at the arguments supporting it. In terms of credulity, that translates into always believing in the latest thing hatched. Of course, Q isn't the latest thing hatched--and to that extent the difference between here and over there might be mitigated to some degree--but I do think that the same blind trust in the fruits of scholarship is at work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1131938249662273862005-11-13T22:17:00.000-05:002005-11-13T22:17:00.000-05:00Wasn’t it you, Mark, who proposed the Q skep...Wasn’t it you, Mark, who proposed the Q skepticism in the U.S. tended toward the neo-Griesbach School (Farmer, Dungan, Longstaff, Peabody) whereas in the U.K. Q skepticism tended toward the Farrer-Goulder approach?<BR/><BR/>Certainly Q skepticism has a long, persistent tradition on these shores; it’s a little odd to hear that the Atlantic Isles might have an edge on us. . . .AKMAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16776029549322473374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1131862219015808382005-11-13T01:10:00.000-05:002005-11-13T01:10:00.000-05:00Thanks Mark; these are good points. I'll put in an...Thanks Mark; these are good points. I'll put in an update link.Loren Rosson IIIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15002312216839280976noreply@blogger.com