tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post4230912302287420054..comments2024-03-21T14:59:20.729-04:00Comments on NT Blog: DNA and the "Jesus family tomb"Mark Goodacrehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-25791943135205981582007-03-01T06:08:00.000-05:002007-03-01T06:08:00.000-05:00You are assuming that they would be interested in ...You are assuming that they would be interested in falsifying, or even in following a rational process of investigation.<BR/>PeteAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-49517859107032037902007-03-01T00:30:00.000-05:002007-03-01T00:30:00.000-05:00The greatest problem with the DNA testing is that ...The greatest problem with the DNA testing is that the ossuaries had at least 2 skeletons in each. Kloner's report lists a minimum of 35 skeletons in the tomb of which at least 17 were in the 10 ossuaries. Even named ossuaries have multiple skeletons. A controlled dig of an undisturbed tomb reported in Atiqot in 1992 listed over 50 skeletons in 18 ossuaries. Only 2 of the ossuaries had single skeletons. Some had six skeletons. In that no record was kept of the contents of any ossuary at Talpiot, DNA can't be used as evidence of anything.Peter Nathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10317617282658528750noreply@blogger.com