tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post6350353914401013301..comments2024-03-21T14:59:20.729-04:00Comments on NT Blog: Doubts about the story of the discovery at Nag HammadiMark Goodacrehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-30375421095687072602009-10-24T15:32:28.750-04:002009-10-24T15:32:28.750-04:00Thanks, Stephen. Interesting potential material f...Thanks, Stephen. Interesting potential material for reflection there. It is potentially of interest as an analogy in that Ali is illiterate and his stories are written down by literates, and also that one version of the story (Robinson's) has become the accepted version. As I will explain in subsequent posts, there are major variations in the stories, even as presented by Robinson.Mark Goodacrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-70268628052497857702009-10-24T15:30:51.812-04:002009-10-24T15:30:51.812-04:00Thanks for your interesting and helpful comments, ...Thanks for your interesting and helpful comments, Roger. Yes, there is clearly no love lost between Kasser and Krause on the one hand and Robinson on the other. I am going to discuss that a little next time.Mark Goodacrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-34116829784018660522009-10-24T14:48:04.263-04:002009-10-24T14:48:04.263-04:00I wonder if Robinson's gathering of the detail...I wonder if Robinson's gathering of the details some thrity years after the facts from Mohammed Ali is of relevance to what Bauckham discusses in <i>Jesus and the Eyewitnesses</i>.Stephen C. Carlsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18239379955876245197noreply@blogger.com