tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post111334823135842268..comments2024-03-21T14:59:20.729-04:00Comments on NT Blog: Image CriticismMark Goodacrehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1148012894420495422006-05-19T00:28:00.000-04:002006-05-19T00:28:00.000-04:00We clearly have a new candidate for the front page...We clearly have a <A HREF="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3597/1861/1600/fathDaughtDnc5.jpg" REL="nofollow">new candidate for the front page photo</A>.Joe Weakshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16379505860158377008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1113489128280778452005-04-14T10:32:00.000-04:002005-04-14T10:32:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1113472270726866742005-04-14T05:51:00.000-04:002005-04-14T05:51:00.000-04:00I remember when that programme was on TV that all ...I remember when that programme was on TV that all the intereviews seemed to be really badly lit. I personally think it's the right photo to have on your site, it's just a shame that the TV lighting person had a bad day!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1113378393087975252005-04-13T03:46:00.000-04:002005-04-13T03:46:00.000-04:00I've tended to go for a landscape or something els...I've tended to go for a landscape or something else on my blog...the problem is with choosing a photo - the one Wieland suggests is a bit formalised and, dare I say it, makes you look a bit 'geeky' and least the one you have chosen makes you look like a real person. Perhaps it is the difference between the historical Mark Goodacre and the real Mark Goodacre? Or perhaps not...<BR/><BR/>PeteAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1113373483635341152005-04-13T02:24:00.000-04:002005-04-13T02:24:00.000-04:00.> Come on, Wieland, don't hold > back! Tell us wh....<BR/>> Come on, Wieland, don't hold <BR/>> back! Tell us what you really <BR/>> think about it!<BR/><BR/>It's crap!<BR/>:-)<BR/>1. I don't have an image on my site. I don't think it is needed. But I think if you HAVE one, it should be a good one. Your page looks overall quite professional, but when I looked at it recently and saw this "image" I was irritated. <BR/>2. Ok, I understand now that this has a more documentary character, like "MG on national TV", but then you should state that. Otherwise one is (at least I am) distracted by this foggy something. <BR/>3. I can see only half of your hand.<BR/>4. JMHO<BR/><BR/>Best wishes<BR/>WielandAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1113368317433576022005-04-13T00:58:00.000-04:002005-04-13T00:58:00.000-04:00I agree with Wieland.(I don't remember seeing a ph...I agree with Wieland.<BR/><BR/>(I don't remember seeing a photo of Wieland on his website. Perhaps I missed it.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1113349460582822402005-04-12T19:44:00.000-04:002005-04-12T19:44:00.000-04:00Take heart Mark. So far as I have been able to se...Take heart Mark. So far as I have been able to see on Wieland's page a photo doesn't even exist. In my mind some photo is better than none and it's easy enough to see that yours is a video capture from some interview or other, even if you hadn't told us. It shows you in that animated posture we all imagine you to constantly inhabit. As for Wieland, we are only left to guess.... ;-)<BR/><BR/>And anyway, your photo is much more pleasing to the eye than my own!Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16698562143972216357noreply@blogger.com