tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post115696576186454617..comments2024-03-21T14:59:20.729-04:00Comments on NT Blog: Burnett Hillman Streeter by John CourtMark Goodacrehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1156972405011429992006-08-30T17:13:00.000-04:002006-08-30T17:13:00.000-04:00Precisely. Thanks for that. And of course the gr...Precisely. Thanks for that. And of course the great thing about [sic]ing a website is that it can then be corrected quickly, unlike something in print, which is why I regret John Court's remarks there.Mark Goodacrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1156972235684539892006-08-30T17:10:00.000-04:002006-08-30T17:10:00.000-04:00Thanks for pointing out the typo. It is now fixed...Thanks for pointing out the typo. It is now fixed.<BR/><BR/>As far as Streeter's being "offended" at my characterization of main arguments as fallacious, that would be shooting the messenger, because the problems with Streeter's abstract arguments have been admitted by friend and foe alike.<BR/><BR/>For example, C. M. Tuckett in his ABD article on the Synoptic Problem, concedes the problems in Streeter's argumentation before fixing them with his own, better grounded arguments. On Streeter's first argument, for instance, Tuckett argues: "On its own this argument can carry no weight at all. ... However, when one ceases to argue abstractly and considers the actual contents of the gospels themselves, then the case for Markan priority can be strengthed." (6:242)Stephen C. Carlsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18239379955876245197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1156971768914454982006-08-30T17:02:00.000-04:002006-08-30T17:02:00.000-04:00I don't know, Crystal. I've not met him yet. All...I don't know, Crystal. I've not met him yet. All best, MarkMark Goodacrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-1156966495979854562006-08-30T15:34:00.000-04:002006-08-30T15:34:00.000-04:00An off-the-subject question - Mark, doesn't theolo...An off-the-subject question - Mark, doesn't theologian David Bently Hart teach at Duke? What do you think of him?crystalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05681674503952991492noreply@blogger.com