Jack Poirier's article, which I mentioned the other day, on the Statistics behind the "Jesus Family Tomb", is now available at the Jerusalem Perspective Online:
The Statistics Behind "The Tomb"
Jack Poirier
This may be a good occasion to bring together in one place the other major articles on the statistical case:
Statistics and the "Jesus Family Tomb"
Randy Ingermanson
Examining the "Jesus Tomb" Evidence
Jay Cost
The Improper Application of Statistics in "The Lost Tomb of Jesus"
Stephen Pfann
Talpiot Tomb: Statistics
Includes several posts by Joe D'Mello
The last of these links is to all the material relevant to the statistical case from this blog, including several guest posts by Joe D'Mello, in interaction with Andrey Feuerverger, whose most recent statement is on his homepage.
James,
ReplyDeleteYou know....It would really be nice to have a comments section on your blog. You're really one of the central figures in what has now become a fairly controversial argument, and it would be terrific to actually be able to interact critically with some of the arguments you've been making on your blog, and for others to have the ability to see that critical interaction.
Would you consider opening it up for comments?
Sincerely,
Alex Dalton
Hi,
ReplyDeleteJames, you would do a service to place the following two quotes prominently on your website.
> "Feueverger ... numbers had
> nothing to do with the
> identification with the Jesus tomb"
> "People don’t realize how unique
> sets of even common names are
> when it comes to simple probabilities".
The speaker ?
James Tabor .. on ANE.
Shalom,
Steven Avery
schmuel@nyc.rr.com
PS.
James, I answered your last ANE post on IIDB when ANE closed the thread.
http://tinyurl.com/2j4cpq
Since you clearly did not understand my original ANE post, based on your ascribing to me a position I had not even remotely taken.
Tabor has been posting comments on other people's blogs all over the internet. Yet he doesn't allow comments on HIS blog!
ReplyDeleteHmmm . . .
Though I do not think the East Talpiot tomb is "the Jesus family tomb," nor that there was good scholarly reason to make such a claim, I'm interested in some of the related questions that have been raised. Thanks a lot to James Tabor for making available a good high res photo of the Greek inscription. Rahmani's Catalog is indeed excellent, but, so far (I may not be up to date with all the arguments and am open to new data), I think Pfann's reading with kai engraved (and not assumed) is more likely than as the ending letters of the first name. Not to say that clears everything up. But if Pfann's kai is right, it, according to Prof. Feuerverger (as quoted in Wall St. J.) may mean that "The mathematical finding would become 'statistically not significant.'" Rahmani's reference to RB v.10 is 2nd series = continuous v. 22; the Beth Shearim ref.: "Sarah from Meishan who is (also called) Maxima"-eta, no kai. That's a Hebrew/Latin double name, not Aramaic/Aramaic. Cf. Hebrew/Greek Shlomzion/Alexandra. Would a hypocoristic be coupled with Lord or Master (real question)? How many Jewish fem. double names are in two languages vs. one? Which names are coupled? Did Tal Ilan read a written or assumed kai? What think Puech, Rajak, Cotton, Bowersock, Tsaferis...? Does Pfann have parallels for his proposed word-divider stroke? Can a "signum" come after kai? The Gk. surely gets more cursive--can anyone show a parallel that goes cursive in one hand that fast? I don't see a difference in the type writing implement. It might be interesting to review other cases of proposed inscriptions previously proposed as linked with otherwise known individuals. Maybe try again to read the inscription with the crucified/nail remains.
ReplyDeleteStephen Goranson
http://www.duke.edu/~goranson
Forgive me if I am mistaken, but I think that there are not two, but (at least) three different readings of the East Talpiot ossuary Greek inscription on the table, so to speak.
ReplyDelete1) L. Y. Rahmani and others:
mariamenu (eta) mara
2) Tal Ilan (reportedly) and others (two I just asked):
mariam eta kai mara
3) S. Pfann and others:
mariame kai mara
2 and 3 differ on whether the eta is the last letter of the first name or part of the formula between the two names
Stephen Goranson
http://www.duke.edu/~goranson
Stephen Pfann has posted A SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE on the Talpiot Greek inscription,
ReplyDelete(Rahmani no. 701) addressing a third proposed reading:
http://www.uhl.ac/Lost_Tomb/MaryAndMarthaNote/
Stephen Goranson
http://www.duke.edu/~goranson
James has at least tried, in a difficult situation, to interact on blogs, websites, email forums and personally. Much as I might be viewed as a strong critic (most especially on the strange probability claims, now largely and belatedly removed from the Jesus Family Tomb website) I would be the first to acknowledge that James ..
ReplyDeletea) Makes an attempt to dialog
b) Is concerned about integrity issues
c) Has at times been criticized unfairly
Shalom,
Steven Avery