The new issue of New Testament Studies is out. Abstracts free for all; the remaining content is for subscribers and subscribing institutions:
NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES, VOLUME 57 - ISSUE 03
‘Blessed is Whoever is Not Offended by Me’: The Subversive Appropriation of (Royal) Messianic Ideology in Q 3–7
Simon J. Joseph
New Testament Studies, Volume 57, Issue 03, July 2011, pp 307-324
doi: 10.1017/S0028688510000329, Published online by Cambridge University Press 08 Jun 2011
Galatians 5.11: Evidence of an Early Law-observant Mission by Paul?
Douglas A. Campbell
New Testament Studies, Volume 57, Issue 03, July 2011, pp 325-347
doi: 10.1017/S002868851100004X, Published online by Cambridge University Press 08 Jun 2011
Paul's Appropriation of Philo's Theory of ‘Two Men’ in 1 Corinthians 15.45–49
Stefan Nordgaard
New Testament Studies, Volume 57, Issue 03, July 2011, pp 348-365
doi: 10.1017/S0028688511000075, Published online by Cambridge University Press 08 Jun 2011
Leben allein aus Gnade. Eph 2.1-10 und die paulinische Rechtfertigungsbotschaft
Christine Gerber
New Testament Studies, Volume 57, Issue 03, July 2011, pp 366-391
doi: 10.1017/S0028688511000051, Published online by Cambridge University Press 08 Jun 2011
Gott als verlässlicher Käufer: Einige Papyrologische Anmerkungen und bibeltheologische Schlussfolgerungen zum Gottesbild der Paulusbriefe
Peter Arzt-Grabner
New Testament Studies, Volume 57, Issue 03, July 2011, pp 392-414
doi: 10.1017/S0028688511000038, Published online by Cambridge University Press 08 Jun 2011
The Encomiastic Topics of Syncrisis as the Key to the Structure and Argument of Hebrews
Michael W. Martin and Jason A. Whitlark
New Testament Studies, Volume 57, Issue 03, July 2011, pp 415-439
doi: 10.1017/S0028688511000099, Published online by Cambridge University Press 08 Jun 2011
Why Did the Early Christians Call Themselves ?
Paul Trebilco
New Testament Studies, Volume 57, Issue 03, July 2011, pp 440-460
doi: 10.1017/S0028688511000087, Published online by Cambridge University Press 08 Jun 2011
Wednesday, June 08, 2011
Tuesday, June 07, 2011
Biblioblogging Carnival at Unsettled Christianity
Occasionally, I drop off the face of the earth and become so immersed in research that the blogging doesn't so much go onto the back burner as into the back bedroom. It's at times like that the biblioblogging carnivals are so useful. And for May, Joel Watts put together a superb piece over on his number 1 blog:
Biblioblogging Carnival - Unsettled Edition
Talking of number 1 blogs, it seems that these days there is a kind of voting system for blogs too -- May 2011 Top Ten Biblioblogs. Unsurprisingly, the winner there is James McGrath. But coming in at a very impressive number 7 is April DeConick. It's impressive because it's on the basis of a mere four posts in May, compared to Jim West, at number 10, who posted a record-breaking four million, eight hundred and fifty thousand, three hundred and twenty two posts in May.
Update (Thursday, 9.51): Chuck Grantham comments, over on A 'Goula Blogger.
Biblioblogging Carnival - Unsettled Edition
Talking of number 1 blogs, it seems that these days there is a kind of voting system for blogs too -- May 2011 Top Ten Biblioblogs. Unsurprisingly, the winner there is James McGrath. But coming in at a very impressive number 7 is April DeConick. It's impressive because it's on the basis of a mere four posts in May, compared to Jim West, at number 10, who posted a record-breaking four million, eight hundred and fifty thousand, three hundred and twenty two posts in May.
Update (Thursday, 9.51): Chuck Grantham comments, over on A 'Goula Blogger.
New Bible Gateway features SBL Greek NT
The new version of the Bible Gateway launched last week. It's been on the web for an age. In fact, when I started my NT Gateway back in 1997, it was one of my first links. The new version includes something that will be of interest and use to Bible scholars, another quick and easy way to access the SBL Greek New Testament.
Conference Announcement: Romans 5-8 at Princeton Theological Seminary
|
Monday, June 06, 2011
Library of New Testament Studies Latest Titles
Library of New Testament Studies latest titles include:
|
|
|
Sunday, June 05, 2011
Was Winston Churchill a Myth (a pig in a hat)?
One of my favourite comedians is Stewart Lee and I am loving the second series of his Comedy Vehicle currently airing on BBC2. The most recent episode featured a hilarious sketch that reminded me, with all due respect and with apologies, of the Jesus Mythicists. It's about the historical evidence for Winston Churchill who, it turns out, was actually just a pig in a hat. (Warning: contains expletives):
Saturday, June 04, 2011
Michael Thompson's Clothed with Christ
It's good to see that Wipf and Stock have re-published Michael Thompson's Clothed With Christ The Example and Teaching of Jesus in Romans 12.1—15.13, which was originally published by Sheffield Academic Press.
Thursday, June 02, 2011
New JSNT
The latest issue of the Journal for the Study of the New Testament is now out. Here is the alert:
Journal for the Study of the New Testament -- Table of Contents Alert
A new issue of Journal for the Study of the New Testament has been made available:
1 June 2011; Vol. 33, No. 4
URL: http://jnt.sagepub.com/content/vol33/issue4/?etoc
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Articles
-----------------------------------------------------------------
'Who Can Forgive Sins but God Alone?' Human and Angelic Agents, and Divine Forgiveness in Early Judaism
Daniel Johansson
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 351-374
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/351?etoc
Not the Prologue of John
P.J. Williams
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 375-386
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/375?etoc
Exploring the Sense-scape of the Gospel of Mark
Louise Lawrence
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 387-397
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/387?etoc
Book Review: Gunnar Samuelsson, Crucifixion in Antiquity: An Inquiry into the Background of the New Testament Terminology of Crucifixion (Dissertation, University of Gothenburg, 2010)
Brian Pounds
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 398-405
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/33/4/398?etoc
Stoic Physics and the Christ-event: A Review of Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
John M.G. Barclay
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 406-414
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/406?etoc
Paul in the Stoa Poecile: A Response to Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit (Oxford, 2010)
John R. Levison
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 415-432
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/415?etoc
Paul's Body: A Response to Barclay and Levison
Troels Engberg-Pedersen
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 433-443
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/433?etoc
Journal for the Study of the New Testament -- Table of Contents Alert
A new issue of Journal for the Study of the New Testament has been made available:
1 June 2011; Vol. 33, No. 4
URL: http://jnt.sagepub.com/content/vol33/issue4/?etoc
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Articles
-----------------------------------------------------------------
'Who Can Forgive Sins but God Alone?' Human and Angelic Agents, and Divine Forgiveness in Early Judaism
Daniel Johansson
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 351-374
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/351?etoc
Not the Prologue of John
P.J. Williams
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 375-386
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/375?etoc
Exploring the Sense-scape of the Gospel of Mark
Louise Lawrence
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 387-397
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/387?etoc
Book Review: Gunnar Samuelsson, Crucifixion in Antiquity: An Inquiry into the Background of the New Testament Terminology of Crucifixion (Dissertation, University of Gothenburg, 2010)
Brian Pounds
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 398-405
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/33/4/398?etoc
Stoic Physics and the Christ-event: A Review of Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
John M.G. Barclay
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 406-414
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/406?etoc
Paul in the Stoa Poecile: A Response to Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit (Oxford, 2010)
John R. Levison
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 415-432
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/415?etoc
Paul's Body: A Response to Barclay and Levison
Troels Engberg-Pedersen
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2011;33 433-443
http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/4/433?etoc
Wednesday, June 01, 2011
66 Books in 66 seconds
Duke University Dept of Religion Facebook page
We now have our own Facebook page. Please come and visit and "like" us:
Duke University Department of Religion Facebook page
Duke University Department of Religion Facebook page
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
B-Greek on the move
One of my earliest experiences of the internet was going on b-greek, the Biblical Greek mailing list, back in the mid 90s. I remember thinking, "Wow, this internet thing is amazing! You can get regular 'emails' plopping into your Pegasus 'inbox' that discuss natty little problems of New Testament Greek!" I remember being so excited that I printed out the daily digest and read it on the train (from university station up to Kings Norton) on the way home.
The list has been going since 1992 and for many of us it has been a great way of discussing interesting problems in NT and related texts. Even when one is not contributing, it is often great to listen in to what others are discussing, even if there is something of a tendency towards theological topics.
Well, now it is on the move. It is morphing from an email list to a forum set-up and you can access the new b-greek here:
B-Greek: The Biblical Greek Forum
Now it is divided up into lots of little "interest groups" and there are other advantages like unicode support and better searchability. I am going to miss the old email list format, but I have already registered for the new forum and I am going to follow via RSS feed and add it to my blogroll so that I don't miss anything important.
Update (11.12am): On second thoughts, the volume of posts on the b-greek forum is going to flood my blogroll so I will take it off the blogroll for now and perhaps create a new one in due course that incorporates the other e-lists too.
The list has been going since 1992 and for many of us it has been a great way of discussing interesting problems in NT and related texts. Even when one is not contributing, it is often great to listen in to what others are discussing, even if there is something of a tendency towards theological topics.
Well, now it is on the move. It is morphing from an email list to a forum set-up and you can access the new b-greek here:
B-Greek: The Biblical Greek Forum
Now it is divided up into lots of little "interest groups" and there are other advantages like unicode support and better searchability. I am going to miss the old email list format, but I have already registered for the new forum and I am going to follow via RSS feed and add it to my blogroll so that I don't miss anything important.
Update (11.12am): On second thoughts, the volume of posts on the b-greek forum is going to flood my blogroll so I will take it off the blogroll for now and perhaps create a new one in due course that incorporates the other e-lists too.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Rejected Exam Paper
David Rattigan this morning tweeted this hilarious Rejected Exam Paper on the New Testament, which he penned ten years ago, in the spirit of 1066 and All That. Here's the link and a sample:
Rejected Exam Paper
Rejected Exam Paper
4. Would you say that Cleopatra was directly responsible for the corporeal decline of Herod the Great? If not, what would you say?
5. Describe, in excessive detail, the woman at the well. What were her pneumatological implications? Could you suggest a suitable remedy?
6. Briefly solve the synoptic problem (3-4 lines max). Explain why the problem still baffles scholars today, and suggest what should be done to them.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Sepphoris 2011 Excavations
My colleagues Eric Meyers and Carol Meyers, and graduate student Alan Todd are pictured here excavating in Sepphoris. There is a new blog dedicated to the dig:
David Hendin's Sepphoris 2011 Excavation Blog
It's a really thorough, day by day, detailed account and there are tons of pictures. Really makes you wish that you were there!
David Hendin's Sepphoris 2011 Excavation Blog
It's a really thorough, day by day, detailed account and there are tons of pictures. Really makes you wish that you were there!
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Sharon Mattila's Statistics and the Synoptic Problem: Some Quibbles
One of my favourite spare time activities is to dip into statistical studies of the Synoptic Problem. One day I might even write something about it. In going back over an article by Sharon Lea Mattila recently, I noticed that I had scribbled all over my print copy and that some of my scribblings might usefully be transferred to a blog post lest they get lost.
The article I wish to comment on is Sharon Lea Mattila, "Negotiating the Clouds Around Statistics and 'Q': A Rejoinder and Independent Analysis," Novum Testamentum 46/2 (2004): 105-31. The article is a detailed, lengthy and frequently polemical response to Charles E. Carlston and Dennis Norlin, "Statistics and Q -- Some Further Observations," NovT 41 (1999), itself largely a response to an earlier article by Mattila. For an excellent summary of these and other works on statistical studies of the Synoptic Problem, and for full bibliography, see John Poirier, "Statistical Studies of the Verbal Agreements and their Impact on the Synoptic Problem," Currents in Biblical Research 7 (2008): 68-123.
The gist of the article is that Mattila thinks that Carlston and Norlin have overstated the case that Matthew and Luke preserved the Q sayings more faithfully than the Marcan sayings. One of the key elements in the article is "an independent statistical analysis" that attempts to avoid what she sees as the flaws in their earlier study.
My comments here relate to difficulties with Mattila's figures tabulated on pp. 125-6 of the article:
(1) Mattila claims to avoid "such pitfalls as including sayings containing words from Scripture" (p. 121) but two of her parallels feature quotations from Scripture:
contexts:
(3) Mattila includes the Lucan woes in her analysis in spite of the fact that they have no parallel in Matthew, and against her stated objective of treating Aland's synopsis divisions as the standard. She is conscious that this is problematic (p. 121).
(4) This is a point that is rarely treated seriously in statistical studies of the Synoptics. Parable material occupies an interesting position here in that it is both sayings material (in attribution to Jesus) and narrative (in form). Parallel parables appear often to be much less close to one another in wording than is other sayings material. Indeed, they sometimes imitate the way that narrative material appears. Mattila's double tradition table includes four parables across 47 verses of Matthew:
The article I wish to comment on is Sharon Lea Mattila, "Negotiating the Clouds Around Statistics and 'Q': A Rejoinder and Independent Analysis," Novum Testamentum 46/2 (2004): 105-31. The article is a detailed, lengthy and frequently polemical response to Charles E. Carlston and Dennis Norlin, "Statistics and Q -- Some Further Observations," NovT 41 (1999), itself largely a response to an earlier article by Mattila. For an excellent summary of these and other works on statistical studies of the Synoptic Problem, and for full bibliography, see John Poirier, "Statistical Studies of the Verbal Agreements and their Impact on the Synoptic Problem," Currents in Biblical Research 7 (2008): 68-123.
The gist of the article is that Mattila thinks that Carlston and Norlin have overstated the case that Matthew and Luke preserved the Q sayings more faithfully than the Marcan sayings. One of the key elements in the article is "an independent statistical analysis" that attempts to avoid what she sees as the flaws in their earlier study.
My comments here relate to difficulties with Mattila's figures tabulated on pp. 125-6 of the article:
(1) Mattila claims to avoid "such pitfalls as including sayings containing words from Scripture" (p. 121) but two of her parallels feature quotations from Scripture:
- Matt. 10.34-6 // Luke 12.51-53 quotes Micah 7.6
- Matt. 21.13 // Luke 19.46 is a famous composite quotation of Isa. 56.7 and Jer. 7.11.
contexts:
- Matt. 10.19-20 // Luke 12.11-12
- Matt. 13.31b-2 // Luke 13.18b-19
- Matt. 16.6b // Luke 12.1b
- Matt. 18.6-7 // Luke 17.1b-3a.
(3) Mattila includes the Lucan woes in her analysis in spite of the fact that they have no parallel in Matthew, and against her stated objective of treating Aland's synopsis divisions as the standard. She is conscious that this is problematic (p. 121).
(4) This is a point that is rarely treated seriously in statistical studies of the Synoptics. Parable material occupies an interesting position here in that it is both sayings material (in attribution to Jesus) and narrative (in form). Parallel parables appear often to be much less close to one another in wording than is other sayings material. Indeed, they sometimes imitate the way that narrative material appears. Mattila's double tradition table includes four parables across 47 verses of Matthew:
- Matt. 7.24-27 // Luke 6.47-9
- Matt. 18.12-14 // Luke 15.4-7
- Matt. 22.2-14 // Luke 14.16b-24
- Matt. 25.14-30 // Luke 19.12b-27
- Matt. 13.3b-9 and 18-23 // Luke 8.5-8a and 11-15
- Matt. 13.31b-32 // Luke 13.18-19
- Matt. 21.33-40 // Luke 20.9b-15
Monday, May 16, 2011
The Synoptic Problem for Kindle (free)
With thanks to one of my readers, it is now also available for free for your kindle -- just go to the archive.org page for the links.
Lead Codices and the Media
Thomas Verenna has an excellent article in Bible and Interpretation on the fake metal codices, with special emphasis on the media failure to check with the experts:
Artifacts and the Media: Lead Codices and the Public Portrayal of History
Artifacts and the Media: Lead Codices and the Public Portrayal of History
Monday, May 09, 2011
Robert Cargill lays into Simcha Jacobovici's Nails of the Cross
Bob Cargill has published an excellent, thorough debunking of the ludicrous Nails of the Cross documentary that recently aired on the History Channel:
A Critique of Simcha Jacobovici’s Secrets of Christianity: Nails of the Cross
One of the elements mentioned by Bob is the work of Barrie Wilson who has apparently co-authored a book with Simcha Jacobovici to come out next year on the Arabic Infancy Gospel of the Savior. Wilson's website provides a teaser:
A Critique of Simcha Jacobovici’s Secrets of Christianity: Nails of the Cross
Simcha makes two bold claims to say the least: the first is that the lost nails of Jesus’ crucifixion have been recovered, and the second is an implicit assertion that the IAA covered it up. Unfortunately for Simcha, his theory has a problem, and its name is Legion, for they are many. Any one of these problems renders Simcha’s theory impossible, and their aggregate renders the theory preposterous.Bob does not mince his words but at the same time patiently demonstrates why the theory is so absurd. My comments on the fiasco are gathered here.
One of the elements mentioned by Bob is the work of Barrie Wilson who has apparently co-authored a book with Simcha Jacobovici to come out next year on the Arabic Infancy Gospel of the Savior. Wilson's website provides a teaser:
BRIDE OF GOD:
A Lost Gospel of Jesus’ Marriage to Mary Magdalene
by Simcha Jacobovici and Barrie Wilson
In Bride of God: A Lost Gospel of Jesus’ Marriage to Mary Magdalene, the authors take us into the world of an early Christian community that encoded its beliefs in a now forgotten manuscript, presently collecting dust in the British Museum. In the course of the investigation, the authors decode the manuscript using techniques employed by early Christians for understanding ancient writings. Part mystery story, part adventure/travel and part historical investigation, Bride of God reveals up to now unknown details about Jesus’ family, sexuality and marriage . . . .Good grief.
Subscribing by email to the NT Blog and the NT Pod
A correspondent asked about an email subscription option for the NT Blog. I hadn't realized that I had not set one up and I have now done so:
Subscribe to NT Blog by Email
While I was at it, I made sure I also had an email subscription option for the NT Pod:
Subscribe to NT Pod by Email
I've added links on the sidebars of each page too.
Subscribe to NT Blog by Email
While I was at it, I made sure I also had an email subscription option for the NT Pod:
Subscribe to NT Pod by Email
I've added links on the sidebars of each page too.
Friday, May 06, 2011
Continued Media Fail on the Fake Metal Codices
Over on Paleojudaica, Jim Davila is keeping an eye on the Fake Metal Codices with a new and uninformed piece in the Christian Science Monitor. As Jim notes, there is no attempt to try to find experts to comment on the piece.
I was listening to a most enjoyable (but far too short) programme from BBC World Service the other day on the Hitler Diaries, Witness: The Hitler Diaries Hoax (podcast version here). In a day before the internet and blogging (1983), it took the media about a week to realize that they had been sold a hoax. This story has now been running for two months without any widespread recognition that they are fakes and with few serious attempts to consult experts. It's pathetic.
I was listening to a most enjoyable (but far too short) programme from BBC World Service the other day on the Hitler Diaries, Witness: The Hitler Diaries Hoax (podcast version here). In a day before the internet and blogging (1983), it took the media about a week to realize that they had been sold a hoax. This story has now been running for two months without any widespread recognition that they are fakes and with few serious attempts to consult experts. It's pathetic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


