I have been invited by the Student Advisory Board at the Society of Biblical Literature to speak at a session on the "Wired-in Generation". It is on Saturday at 1pm and the details of the program are at the bottom of this post. My title is "Pods, Blogs and other Time-wasters: Do Electronic Media Detract from Proper Scholarship?"
Putting "pods" at the front of that title is a deliberate and self-indulgent reference to my own attempts at podcasting, something that at this point still marks out my own online output as a little different from others'. In spite of the massive proliferation of academic blogs in recent years, there are still relatively few podcasts around, thinking especially of genuine podcasts, i.e. programmes produced specially for the occasion of disseminating via the internet, and not just online recordings of lectures.
Having produced the
NT Pod for over two years now, I am still struck at how podcasting differs from a lot of the other stuff one does online. Somehow, perhaps because it takes
so much longer to prepare, record and produce a podcast than it does to blog, it feels like it has a longevity that the blogs lack. But perhaps it is just that it is a relatively new medium. Perhaps podcasts will, in the long run, go the way of other experiments on the net and will come to be seen as "of their time", dated, forgettable, a waste of time.
My title is, of course, slightly facetious given that I have "wasted" a huge amount of my own time in online activities. First, back in the mid to late 90s, it was the e-lists. I still remember the thrill of participating in the e-lists, first b-greek and Crosstalk and later also Synoptic-L and several others. The late 90s were their hey-day. Back then, the whole world was not on email and it now seems extraordinary to imagine that it was actually a thrill to receive an email. And to receive emails from all around the world and to be able to reply instantly, arguing about some element of Greek grammar, or some theme in Historical Jesus scholarship -- it was genuinely exciting stuff.
I have similar memories of the early days of blogging, roughly a decade ago. When Jim Davila began his
Paleojudaica blog, I read it avidly. It was the first blog I remember even being aware of. It wasn't long before I wanted to begin my own, then as a sister to the New Testament Gateway site that I had been running since the late nineties, though later under its own
NT Blog heading. Back then blogging was easy, innovative and fun. With so few people blogging in our area, there were only a handful of blogs to read, and that gave one more time to write. There was a thrill in exploring the new medium, and I loved it.
The email lists have not gone away, but their importance has diminished massively now that we are all desperately fighting to stay on top of the hoards of daily emails, longingly imagining that simpler world that we once inhabited with its letters, memos and time for reading. Looking back on the heyday of the e-lists, I can't help thinking that I must have wasted a huge amount of time on them. It really felt like it mattered when one was deep in debate with someone about some point of Greek grammar, or some argument for the existence of Q. But what value was it really? I am embarrassed to think of the boldness with which we circulated our half-baked opinions and relieved to think that lots of that stuff has vanished from the net, never to be seen again.
But what about blogs? What about the time spent blogging? Could it have been spent more profitably doing something else instead, like reading a book, taking a walk or sleeping? I remember how people would sometimes comment on the time stamps on my posts, so often written in the early hours of the morning. I used to say that that was the only way that I could find time to blog, and I think I believed it. Why didn't I just take life a little easier? Or why didn't I write more real stuff and get more published?
3,604 posts in eight years. Hundreds of thousands of words. Hours, days, weeks of time wasted. Why did I bother? Why do any of us bother? After all, I am not the most prolific blogger, not by a long shot. How much time has been burned up by the likes of uber-bloggers like
James McGrath,
Jim West and
Joel Watts?
Back in the early days of doing scholarship on the internet, I remember being asked by another scholar about the value of this sort of work, not, at that point, blogging, but e-lists, websites and the like. I was working in the UK at the time where we had a thing called the "Research Assessment Exercise". I wouldn't be able to submit any of my internet stuff to that, would I? I was a little take aback by the question. It had never even occurred to me that the internet stuff might be taking me away from proper scholarship, the kind of stuff that one could submit to the RAE. Perhaps he was right; perhaps this is not the way for a true scholar to behave.
Anyone who has had a blog for a while will be aware of just how short our memories are. When the same old question comes back around again -- there is a kind of blog cycle -- it is rare for one of us to say, "Oh, I remember a great post about that two or three years ago." Blogs are ephemeral. Blog posts do not endure. Even if you keep a full archive of everything you have ever posted, the vast majority of your posts, the great bulk of activity, 99% of your output evaporates from consciousness. Here today, gone tomorrow.
I have often been surprised at what I forget of my own blogging activity. I was pleasantly surprised to find a reference in a recent article written by John Lyons, and published in the Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, to something I had once said here about the conflict between the criterion of multiple attestation and the criterion of embarrassment in historical Jesus research. It was a good thought, I think, but one that I had completely forgotten.
But here is another thought. Perhaps I would have forgotten that idea forever if I had not blogged it. Perhaps this is one of the values of a blog -- it is the chance to put down a marker in the sand, to share some thoughts, to put things out there and to see what happens. Indeed, this is one of the values of the medium -- it is a little more than the casual conversation but a little less than the published piece. It can occupy a kind of middle ground. It is a sketch pad, but it is also interactive. If you are lucky, people talk back.
A New Testament scholar once asked my advice on starting a blog in order to support his new book that was coming out, to give it a bit of extra publicity and to provide a place where people could come and interact with him about the book. I advised caution. Blogs that are set up to support publications seldom last very long, not least because they end up being rather self-possessed and narrow. The most successful blogs, or the ones that I like reading, are those that range widely, blogs that chat about topics that are outside the narrowly defined area of a particular scholar's research interest, and touch on ephemera related more broadly to the discipline.
They are great for intellectual tidbits, the things you just can't resist sharing but know will never make it into one of your publications. They are places for notes about teaching, for reflections on the funny side of scholarship, for research ideas that would otherwise never see the light of day. And it's worth thinking too of those ideas that are better left to the blog alone, or would have better left even off the blog. Sometimes blogging is all you need to do to convince yourself that an idea does not have legs and can be quietly dropped.
I don't think I'd advise anyone to start a blog unless there was a chance that they would be become an enthusiast. In the end, it has to be its own reward. The same is true with those other bits of public technology, podcasts, gateway sites, even the ones that now look long in the tooth, the e-lists, the scholarly websites. That's why I don't regret the time I have spent online. I have enjoyed it and it is just possible that it has made me a better scholar. It's certainly given me some practice in writing, in interacting with others, and in improving my teaching.
I suppose that what I am saying to the graduate students is that it really is a waste of time to blog, to podcast, even to tweet, if you are doing it for its own sake, to gain recognition or something like that. But if it's something you'd enjoy, it does have its rewards. I sometimes think, "That's bloggable!" even if I don't get around to blogging it. Or "I could do a podcast on that!" even when I never find the time to sit down and record. And that's something that can keep you sane, which can't be a bad thing.
Engaging the "Wired-In Generation": Knowledge and Learning in the Digital Age
11/19/2011
1:00 PM to 2:30 PM
Room: 3002 - Convention Center
Theme: Hosted by the Student Advisory Board
Teresa Calpino, Loyola University of Chicago, Presiding
Mark Goodacre, Duke University
Pods, Blogs, and other Time-wasters: Do Electronic Media Detract from Proper Scholarship? (15 min)
Christian Brady, Pennsylvania State University
On the Internet No One Knows You're a Grad Student, Or How Social Media Can Help You, Build You Up, and Tear You Down (15 min)
Kelley Coblentz Bautch, St. Edward's University
Videoconferencing in the Classroom: Broadening the Horizons of Students through Interactive Scholarly Exchange(15 min)
Discussion (30 min)
